Publication biases make my ovaries whimper

A majority of graduate students in ecology are female, but the pipeline sure is leaky. Maybe it’s because of Ye Olde Career/Motherhood Issues (can’t dive with a baby), maybe it’s because women burn to nuture non-profits instread of cut academic throats, maybe we are all just delicate blooms perishing away in the burning Science Sun. Or maybe not.

Jarrett Byrnes of i’m a chordata, urochordata has an excellent post on the effect of having a recognizable female name on one’s chances of publication. Jarrett writes:

To test the idea, [a study in Trends in Ecology & Evolution] looked at the journal Behavioral Ecology, that instituted a double blind peer review process in 2001 – so, not only do authors not know who is reviewing their papers, but reviewers don’t know the names of the authors. The relative proportion of female first author papers increased.

Even controlled for the increasing number of female ecologists, this represents a 33% increase in the representation of female authors. Just from going double-blind during the review process. Go read the rest of Jarrett’s post for pretty graphs and more disturbing facts.

This fairly huge bias, unconcious though it may be, is terrifying to a baby scientist of the XX persuasion. The vast majority of journals are not double-blind. When I eventually get published, I will probably use my first and middle initials – and not just because that gives me the rockin’ moniker MC Goldstein.

Advertisements

3 Responses to Publication biases make my ovaries whimper

  1. Martini-Corona says:

    > can’t dive with a baby

    Sure you can! What’s blue and orange and sinks to the bottom of the pool? What’s green and orange and floats at the top? Etc.

  2. My spawn will be green and orange? AWESOME.

    Unless I have completely missed something. Which means that I’m not funny. Which means that Christopher Hitchens is right. O NOES!

  3. Martini-Corona says:

    They’re the beginnings of dead baby jokes. Which are (arguably) not at all funny. So I guess CH is right, but about me, not you.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: